Is SCOTUS for Discrimination?

I know you wanted to read my response to the SCOTUS Hobby Lobby ruling. I'm slow...so here it finally is:

I thank God every day for separation of church and state. I also thank God for how blessed  I am to live in a place where I am not discriminated against (so says the law) because of my religious beliefs. I mean, you can be Sikh in our army and wear a full beard and a turban. That's awesome!

I'm also thankful that I live in a place that my opinions (and therefore beliefs) are protected in the public space.

Have you seen the problem yet? I'm a little surprised the majority of the justices didn't.

By saying that companies can impose their religious beliefs on their workers through health insurance, we have opened up the doors to a mess of issues.

What if someone eats beef? Must they stop if they work for a Hindu? What if someone needs a blood transfusion? Must they find alternative treatments if they work for a Jehovah's Witness? What if a woman needs hormonal birth control to treat other health issues and works for some place like Hobby Lobby? What if a woman needs a dead fetus removed from her womb? Is that not covered when she works for certain Christian organizations?!

And this doesn't stop there. Since this is my faith blog, I won't touch the fact the Supreme Court is attacking female reproductive rights and female health yet again...

The issue we need to discuss here is the erosion of nondiscrimination. Necessarily individuals will choose to apply to other employment. While this is not technically discrimination, it is in fact. It facilitates work environments that are not friendly to diverse employee demographics. It facilitates segregation. This is counter to the spirit of America.

There is, to put it mildly, no way in Hell I will ever work for nor support Hobby Lobby. Ever. Period.

And as for SCOTUS? I'll pray for wisdom.

No Prayer! Why The Supreme Court is Wrong

Prayer should not be in public/government spaces. This is because it gives the impression of endorsing a particular religious view. That can't happen. Church and state need to be separate.

So unless the state starts holding prayers for every religion represented in a given community (which some communities do), I'd prefer government officials didn't encourage religious prayer in government functions.

But then again, what if there was one prayer and it was Buddhist? Or Muslim? Would SCOTUS have come to the same conclusion? I wonder...

While adults should be able to tolerate a prayer by a different religious group, this kind of decision is something that could easily be abused by a majority religious group. It's something that when prayers of a particular group support exclusivity is a real problem in DEMOCRATIC public spaces. What if someone was fundamentalist Muslim and prayed that all the infidels should be converted? What if a charismatic Christian prayed that women should all return to their "rightful" roles as wives and mothers only? Those kinds of prayers are not conducive to openness, dialogue, and debate. They'd make me want to leave.

I don't know about you, but I was under the impression that courts were supposed to protect minorities. I'd rather not go to a public function and be told I was going to hell for speaking my mind and having a uterus - but this could happen with such a decision.

Don't want to legislate prayers? Then say people should have prayers from every religion in a community or NONE AT ALL. Simple. Instead we got a half-ass, support the majority, church-state-mix-a-lot  decision.

Bad form SCOTUS. Bad form.

Not In Our Backyard! or "I'm a Christian BUT..."

I am shocked and disgusted. I wasn't sure I was going to write this post, but I think I have to. There's a money lender table that needs flipping.

I have to point out the few things that strike me about the battle being waged against my father (and my Father, if you know what I mean).

My dad's church in Goleta has applied and received a permit to participate in a safe parking program. The program allows vetted individuals the opportunity to park in a safe location within the community. These are people who cannot afford a home. They have no home, which isn't too surprising considering they're living in a place which has one of the more expensive housing costs in the country (Thanks prop 13! Thanks no living wage!). The rules of the program in question are incredibly strict, and when violated a single time result in expulsion from the program.

We're not talking about drugged out vagrants here. We're talking about upstanding people who happen to be too poor to live in an apartment. There's a difference.

Poverty is not a crime. However many people from the community have effectively said this very thing. The idea of having poor people in their community is repellent. It is frightening - disgusting.

My father has often called me despairing the negative reaction of community members to the efforts his church is putting towards serving those in need in Goleta and Santa Barbara. He is just doing his job as a pastor, helping his church to realize the will of God in their community as they feel called. What could be more in line with Christian teaching than serving the homeless? I can't imagine anything more Christian.

But maybe my definition of Christian is off base.

One of the things he related to me which was particularly concerning was the repeated statement at the series of hearings held regarding this issue "I'm a Christian, BUT..." Inevitably this phrase is followed by another much more shocking phrase to the tune of "...not in my backyard!"

Ahem.

This type of sentence is akin to saying, "I'm a vegetarian but I eat chicken." Excuse me deary, but if you eat chicken, you're NOT a vegetarian. You're a fraud.

So, "I'm a Christian but I don't want homeless people staying across the street from me!" is confessing that actually, sorry, no - you're NOT a Christian. I don't think the Jews or Muslims would accept you. No, you're pretty much not adhering to the will of God. You're actually going AGAINST God. Read a few scriptures. You'll see it pretty clearly.

I will grant the fact that being a good person of faith is difficult to do. It's something that takes practice and discipline. But some choices presented to us are easy and logical and require little effort. This safe parking program is one of those easy choices. It's not even on the same level as giving your leftovers to the guy begging on the park bench. It's easier than that, and giving your leftovers away is PRETTY easy (speaking as someone who does that regularly when I actually have leftovers). Pushing against such a choice that would have a positive impact on a person's life is a horrible, wretched thing to do. It is not loving. It is not a reflection of God's will.

So, I pray most sincerely that the people of Goleta will be struck like Saul. I pray their hearts will be opened, they will hear the will of God and the call to be a good neighbor to all their neighbors, regardless of their income level or housing status. Amen.

Guns, God, and the American Way

This is because of the US Pastor in Louisville that decided to have an "Open Carry" rally for a service. Seriously guys? Is nothing sacred?