Is SCOTUS for Discrimination?

I know you wanted to read my response to the SCOTUS Hobby Lobby ruling. I'm slow...so here it finally is:

I thank God every day for separation of church and state. I also thank God for how blessed  I am to live in a place where I am not discriminated against (so says the law) because of my religious beliefs. I mean, you can be Sikh in our army and wear a full beard and a turban. That's awesome!

I'm also thankful that I live in a place that my opinions (and therefore beliefs) are protected in the public space.

Have you seen the problem yet? I'm a little surprised the majority of the justices didn't.

By saying that companies can impose their religious beliefs on their workers through health insurance, we have opened up the doors to a mess of issues.

What if someone eats beef? Must they stop if they work for a Hindu? What if someone needs a blood transfusion? Must they find alternative treatments if they work for a Jehovah's Witness? What if a woman needs hormonal birth control to treat other health issues and works for some place like Hobby Lobby? What if a woman needs a dead fetus removed from her womb? Is that not covered when she works for certain Christian organizations?!

And this doesn't stop there. Since this is my faith blog, I won't touch the fact the Supreme Court is attacking female reproductive rights and female health yet again...

The issue we need to discuss here is the erosion of nondiscrimination. Necessarily individuals will choose to apply to other employment. While this is not technically discrimination, it is in fact. It facilitates work environments that are not friendly to diverse employee demographics. It facilitates segregation. This is counter to the spirit of America.

There is, to put it mildly, no way in Hell I will ever work for nor support Hobby Lobby. Ever. Period.

And as for SCOTUS? I'll pray for wisdom.

Getting Over Grudges

In the interest of not getting any particular person in trouble, I will not point out specific situations in the following discussion. I will speak in generalities. So humor me - it's less dangerous this way.

I have noticed that people take things personally.

Whopping surprise, isn't it? Wow, Alexis! People take things personally! Who would have thought?!

Yes, I know. It is common knowledge this is a problem for many individuals. However, this is not just an individual problem. Whenever we are part of a community the way we process information affects how we interact in that community and therefore, affects communal health.

You see where I'm going with this?

Let's examine the most problematic example in taking something personally - the grudge. Gah! I hate grudges! They eat people up inside and come out in passive aggressive and extremely hurtful ways. They can destroy a family or a community. They almost always destroy the person holding them, especially if the grudge is large enough. Grudges are poison, and poison spreads.

Often times the person holding the grudge won't even realize they're holding it. They won't realize their actions are being influenced by these feelings of hurt, anger, and resentment. They can't see how their words are being shaped into weapons, tearing people down, rather than tools meant to build people up.

So if you're in a community of faith and see someone else has a grudge, what do you do? Well, the most difficult thing (and the most necessary) is to get the person to admit their feelings. When they are voiced, they can be dealt with. Bringing things to the light of day allows for healing and cleansing. If you can't help this person deal with their feelings, find someone who can. You are likely not the only person to have observed their hurtful behavior.

Once the person has dealt with their grudge, then the next step is to help them realize actions are not personal. Even if they are, our reactions do not have to let them be personal. It is our choice how we react to a situation.  Choose wisely.

Tolerance, plurality, or co-existance? - an Aside

I saw this video on pomomusings. It caused me to remember many of the lessons I learned while I was in India which I think are relevant to our discussions here. Particularly, I think of how we all seek something more than "this" and how difficult it is for so many of us to find "it". Beyond that, when we do, frequently we tend to be hurtful to those who have a different way of accessing the divine. This is a problem in our globalizing world where so many cultures and religions are interacting at an increasing rate.... the question becomes, how do we deal with this?

Now I would not say that I am tolerant of others views. In fact I am actually quite hard and fast about where I come down. This doesn't mean I won't give you air time. If I were merely tolerant I might simply condescend to allow you to believe whatever it is and smirk behind your back saying my way was the high way. By being forthright and admitting inconsistencies and conflicts, it's much easier to respect the other.

This should not only be practiced in India in political elections, or even on an interfaith level, but rather needs to be practiced on an intrafaith level. That is, different denominations of Christianity need to come into conversation with one another and really talk. May the most pragmatic begin!!

Indian Elections : A Mammoth Democratic Exercise from Shashwat Gupta on Vimeo.